An Investigation of Offline Reinforcement Learning in Factorisable Action Spaces

Expanding reinforcement learning (RL) to offline domains generates promising prospects, particularly in sectors where data collection poses substantial challenges or risks. Pivotal to the success of transferring RL offline is mitigating overestimation bias in value estimates for state-action pairs absent from data. Whilst numerous approaches have been proposed in recent years, these tend to focus primarily on continuous or small-scale discrete action spaces. Factorised discrete action spaces, on the other hand, have received relatively little attention, despite many real-world problems naturally having factorisable actions. In this work, we undertake a formative investigation into offline reinforcement learning in factorisable action spaces. Using value-decomposition as formulated in DecQN as a foundation, we present the case for a factorised approach and conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of several offline techniques adapted to the factorised setting. In the absence of established benchmarks, we introduce a suite of our own comprising datasets of varying quality and task complexity. Advocating for reproducible research and innovation, we make all datasets available for public use alongside our code base.

Balancing policy constraint and ensemble size in uncertainty-based offline reinforcement learning

Offline reinforcement learning agents seek optimal policies from fixed data sets. With environmental interaction prohibited, agents face significant challenges in preventing errors in value estimates from compounding and subsequently causing the learning process to collapse. Uncertainty estimation using ensembles compensates for this by penalising high-variance value estimates, allowing agents to learn robust policies based on data-driven actions. However, the requirement for large ensembles to facilitate sufficient penalisation results in significant computational overhead. In this work, we examine the role of policy constraints as a mechanism for regulating uncertainty, and the corresponding balance between level of constraint and ensemble size. By incorporating behavioural cloning into policy updates, we show empirically that sufficient penalisation can be achieved with a much smaller ensemble size, substantially reducing computational demand while retaining state-of-the-art performance on benchmarking tasks. Furthermore, we show how such an approach can facilitate stable online fine tuning, allowing for continued policy improvement while avoiding severe performance drops.

Improving TD3-BC: Relaxed Policy Constraint for Offline Learning and Stable Online Fine-Tuning

The ability to discover optimal behaviour from fixed data sets has the potential to transfer the successes of reinforcement learning (RL) to domains where data collection is acutely problematic. In this offline setting, a key challenge is overcoming overestimation bias for actions not present in data which, without the ability to correct for via interaction with the environment, can propagate and compound during training, leading to highly sub-optimal policies. One simple method to reduce this bias is to introduce a policy constraint via behavioural cloning (BC), which encourages agents to pick actions closer to the source data. By finding the right balance between RL and BC such approaches have been shown to be surprisingly effective while requiring minimal changes to the underlying algorithms they are based on. To date this balance has been held constant, but in this work we explore the idea of tipping this balance towards RL following initial training. Using TD3-BC, we demonstrate that by continuing to train a policy offline while reducing the influence of the BC component we can produce refined policies that outperform the original baseline, as well as match or exceed the performance of more complex alternatives. Furthermore, we demonstrate such an approach can be used for stable online fine-tuning, allowing policies to be safely improved during deployment.