Abstract:Log parsing is a critical standard operating procedure in software systems, enabling monitoring, anomaly detection, and failure diagnosis. However, automated log parsing remains challenging due to heterogeneous log formats, distribution shifts between training and deployment data, and the brittleness of rule-based approaches. This study aims to systematically evaluate how sequence modelling architecture, representation choice, sequence length, and training data availability influence automated log parsing performance and computational cost. We conduct a controlled empirical study comparing four sequence modelling architectures: Transformer, Mamba state-space, monodirectional LSTM, and bidirectional LSTM models. In total, 396 models are trained across multiple dataset configurations and evaluated using relative Levenshtein edit distance with statistical significance testing. Transformer achieves the lowest mean relative edit distance (0.111), followed by Mamba (0.145), mono-LSTM (0.186), and bi-LSTM (0.265), where lower values are better. Mamba provides competitive accuracy with substantially lower computational cost. Character-level tokenization generally improves performance, sequence length has negligible practical impact on Transformer accuracy, and both Mamba and Transformer demonstrate stronger sample efficiency than recurrent models. Overall, Transformers reduce parsing error by 23.4%, while Mamba is a strong alternative under data or compute constraints. These results also clarify the roles of representation choice, sequence length, and sample efficiency, providing practical guidance for researchers and practitioners.
Abstract:The effectiveness of training neural networks directly impacts computational costs, resource allocation, and model development timelines in machine learning applications. An optimizer's ability to train the model adequately (in terms of trained model performance) depends on the model's initial weights. Model weight initialization schemes use pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) as a source of randomness. We investigate whether substituting PRNGs for low-discrepancy quasirandom number generators (QRNGs) -- namely Sobol' sequences -- as a source of randomness for initializers can improve model performance. We examine Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Transformer architectures trained on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and IMDB datasets using SGD and Adam optimizers. Our analysis uses ten initialization schemes: Glorot, He, Lecun (both Uniform and Normal); Orthogonal, Random Normal, Truncated Normal, and Random Uniform. Models with weights set using PRNG- and QRNG-based initializers are compared pairwise for each combination of dataset, architecture, optimizer, and initialization scheme. Our findings indicate that QRNG-based neural network initializers either reach a higher accuracy or achieve the same accuracy more quickly than PRNG-based initializers in 60% of the 120 experiments conducted. Thus, using QRNG-based initializers instead of PRNG-based initializers can speed up and improve model training.
Abstract:Separating vocal elements from musical tracks is a longstanding challenge in audio signal processing. This study tackles the distinct separation of vocal components from musical spectrograms. We employ the Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) to extract audio waves into detailed frequency-time spectrograms, utilizing the benchmark MUSDB18 dataset for music separation. Subsequently, we implement a UNet neural network to segment the spectrogram image, aiming to delineate and extract singing voice components accurately. We achieved noteworthy results in audio source separation using of our U-Net-based models. The combination of frequency-axis normalization with Min/Max scaling and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) loss function achieved the highest Source-to-Distortion Ratio (SDR) of 7.1 dB, indicating a high level of accuracy in preserving the quality of the original signal during separation. This setup also recorded impressive Source-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) and Source-to-Artifact Ratio (SAR) scores of 25.2 dB and 7.2 dB, respectively. These values significantly outperformed other configurations, particularly those using Quantile-based normalization or a Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss function. Our source code, model weights, and demo material can be found at the project's GitHub repository: https://github.com/mbrotos/SoundSeg