Despite its pivotal role in research experiments, code correctness is often presumed only on the basis of the perceived quality of the results. This comes with the risk of erroneous outcomes and potentially misleading findings. To address this issue, we posit that the current focus on result reproducibility should go hand in hand with the emphasis on coding best practices. We bolster our call to the NLP community by presenting a case study, in which we identify (and correct) three bugs in widely used open-source implementations of the state-of-the-art Conformer architecture. Through comparative experiments on automatic speech recognition and translation in various language settings, we demonstrate that the existence of bugs does not prevent the achievement of good and reproducible results and can lead to incorrect conclusions that potentially misguide future research. In response to this, this study is a call to action toward the adoption of coding best practices aimed at fostering correctness and improving the quality of the developed software.