We study the choice of action space in robot manipulation learning and sim-to-real transfer. We define metrics that assess the performance, and examine the emerging properties in the different action spaces. We train over 250 reinforcement learning~(RL) agents in simulated reaching and pushing tasks, using 13 different control spaces. The choice of action spaces spans popular choices in the literature as well as novel combinations of common design characteristics. We evaluate the training performance in simulation and the transfer to a real-world environment. We identify good and bad characteristics of robotic action spaces and make recommendations for future designs. Our findings have important implications for the design of RL algorithms for robot manipulation tasks, and highlight the need for careful consideration of action spaces when training and transferring RL agents for real-world robotics.