How should we (correctly) compare multiple graphs?

Graphs are used in almost every scientific discipline to express relations among a set of objects. Algorithms that compare graphs, and output a closeness score, or a correspondence among their nodes, are thus extremely important. Despite the large amount of work done, many of the scalable algorithms to compare graphs do not produce closeness scores that satisfy the intuitive properties of metrics. This is problematic since non-metrics are known to degrade the performance of algorithms such as distance-based clustering of graphs (Stratis et al. 2018). On the other hand, the use of metrics increases the performance of several machine learning tasks (Indyk et al. 1999, Clarkson et al. 1999, Angiulli et al. 2002 and Ackermann et al, 2010). In this paper, we introduce a new family of multi-distances (a distance between more than two elements) that satisfies a generalization of the properties of metrics to multiple elements. In the context of comparing graphs, we are the first to show the existence of multi-distances that simultaneously incorporate the useful property of alignment consistency (Nguyen et al. 2011), and a generalized metric property, and that can be computed via convex optimization.