Federated learning is a decentralized machine learning framework wherein not all clients are able to participate in each round. An emerging line of research is devoted to tackling arbitrary client unavailability. Existing theoretical analysis imposes restrictive structural assumptions on the unavailability patterns, and their proposed algorithms were tailored to those assumptions. In this paper, we relax those assumptions and consider adversarial client unavailability. To quantify the degrees of client unavailability, we use the notion of {\em $\epsilon$-adversary dropout fraction}. For both non-convex and strongly-convex global objectives, we show that simple variants of FedAvg or FedProx, albeit completely agnostic to $\epsilon$, converge to an estimation error on the order of $\epsilon (G^2 + \sigma^2)$, where $G$ is a heterogeneity parameter and $\sigma^2$ is the noise level. We prove that this estimation error is minimax-optimal. We also show that the variants of FedAvg or FedProx have convergence speeds $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ for non-convex objectives and $O(1/T)$ for strongly-convex objectives, both of which are the best possible for any first-order method that only has access to noisy gradients. Our proofs build upon a tight analysis of the selection bias that persists in the entire learning process. We validate our theoretical prediction through numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.