Abstract:Large text-to-image models demonstrate impressive generation capabilities; however, their substantial size necessitates expensive cloud servers for deployment. Conversely, light-weight models can be deployed on edge devices at lower cost but often with inferior generation quality for complex user prompts. To strike a balance between performance and cost, we propose a routing framework, called \texttt{RouteT2I}, which dynamically selects either the large cloud model or the light-weight edge model for each user prompt. Since generated image quality is challenging to measure directly, \texttt{RouteT2I} establishes multi-dimensional quality metrics, particularly, by evaluating the similarity between the generated images and both positive and negative texts that describe each specific quality metric. \texttt{RouteT2I} then predicts the expected quality of the generated images by identifying key tokens in the prompt and comparing their impact on the quality. \texttt{RouteT2I} further introduces the Pareto relative superiority to compare the multi-metric quality of the generated images. Based on this comparison and predefined cost constraints, \texttt{RouteT2I} allocates prompts to either the edge or the cloud. Evaluation reveals that \texttt{RouteT2I} significantly reduces the number of requesting large cloud model while maintaining high-quality image generation.