LightPure: Realtime Adversarial Image Purification for Mobile Devices Using Diffusion Models

Autonomous mobile systems increasingly rely on deep neural networks for perception and decision-making. While effective, these systems are vulnerable to adversarial machine learning attacks where minor input perturbations can significantly impact outcomes. Common countermeasures involve adversarial training and/or data or network transformation. These methods, though effective, require full access to typically proprietary classifiers and are costly for large models. Recent solutions propose purification models, which add a "purification" layer before classification, eliminating the need to modify the classifier directly. Despite their effectiveness, these methods are compute-intensive, making them unsuitable for mobile systems where resources are limited and low latency is essential. This paper introduces LightPure, a new method that enhances adversarial image purification. It improves the accuracy of existing purification methods and provides notable enhancements in speed and computational efficiency, making it suitable for mobile devices with limited resources. Our approach uses a two-step diffusion and one-shot Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) framework, prioritizing latency without compromising robustness. We propose several new techniques to achieve a reasonable balance between classification accuracy and adversarial robustness while maintaining desired latency. We design and implement a proof-of-concept on a Jetson Nano board and evaluate our method using various attack scenarios and datasets. Our results show that LightPure can outperform existing methods by up to 10x in terms of latency while achieving higher accuracy and robustness for various attack scenarios. This method offers a scalable and effective solution for real-world mobile systems.

Prompting Code Interpreter to Write Better Unit Tests on Quixbugs Functions

Unit testing is a commonly-used approach in software engineering to test the correctness and robustness of written code. Unit tests are tests designed to test small components of a codebase in isolation, such as an individual function or method. Although unit tests have historically been written by human programmers, recent advancements in AI, particularly LLMs, have shown corresponding advances in automatic unit test generation. In this study, we explore the effect of different prompts on the quality of unit tests generated by Code Interpreter, a GPT-4-based LLM, on Python functions provided by the Quixbugs dataset, and we focus on prompting due to the ease with which users can make use of our findings and observations. We find that the quality of the generated unit tests is not sensitive to changes in minor details in the prompts provided. However, we observe that Code Interpreter is often able to effectively identify and correct mistakes in code that it writes, suggesting that providing it runnable code to check the correctness of its outputs would be beneficial, even though we find that it is already often able to generate correctly-formatted unit tests. Our findings suggest that, when prompting models similar to Code Interpreter, it is important to include the basic information necessary to generate unit tests, but minor details are not as important.