Surrogate Assisted Strategies (The Parameterisation of an Infectious Disease Agent-Based Model)

Parameter calibration is a significant challenge in agent-based modelling and simulation (ABMS). An agent-based model's (ABM) complexity grows as the number of parameters required to be calibrated increases. This parameter expansion leads to the ABMS equivalent of the \say{curse of dimensionality}. In particular, infeasible computational requirements searching an infinite parameter space. We propose a more comprehensive and adaptive ABMS Framework that can effectively swap out parameterisation strategies and surrogate models to parameterise an infectious disease ABM. This framework allows us to evaluate different strategy-surrogate combinations' performance in accuracy and efficiency (speedup). We show that we achieve better than parity in accuracy across the surrogate assisted sampling strategies and the baselines. Also, we identify that the Metric Stochastic Response Surface strategy combined with the Support Vector Machine surrogate is the best overall in getting closest to the true synthetic parameters. Also, we show that DYnamic COOrdindate Search Using Response Surface Models with XGBoost as a surrogate attains in combination the highest probability of approximating a cumulative synthetic daily infection data distribution and achieves the most significant speedup with regards to our analysis. Lastly, we show in a real-world setting that DYCORS XGBoost and MSRS SVM can approximate the real world cumulative daily infection distribution with $97.12$\% and $96.75$\% similarity respectively.

Surrogate Assisted Methods for the Parameterisation of Agent-Based Models

Parameter calibration is a major challenge in agent-based modelling and simulation (ABMS). As the complexity of agent-based models (ABMs) increase, the number of parameters required to be calibrated grows. This leads to the ABMS equivalent of the \say{curse of dimensionality}. We propose an ABMS framework which facilitates the effective integration of different sampling methods and surrogate models (SMs) in order to evaluate how these strategies affect parameter calibration and exploration. We show that surrogate assisted methods perform better than the standard sampling methods. In addition, we show that the XGBoost and Decision Tree SMs are most optimal overall with regards to our analysis.

Comparison of Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Wildfire Spread Modelling

Wildfire modelling is an attempt to reproduce fire behaviour. Through active fire analysis, it is possible to reproduce a dynamical process, such as wildfires, with limited duration time series data. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can model dynamic temporal behaviour due to their ability to remember their internal input. In this paper, we compare the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. We try to determine whether a wildfire continues to burn and given that it does, we aim to predict which one of the 8 cardinal directions the wildfire will spread in. Overall the GRU performs better for longer time series than the LSTM. We have shown that although we are reasonable at predicting the direction in which the wildfire will spread, we are not able to asses if the wildfire continues to burn due to the lack of auxiliary data.