An explainable approach to detect case law on housing and eviction issues within the HUDOC database

Case law is instrumental in shaping our understanding of human rights, including the right to adequate housing. The HUDOC database provides access to the textual content of case law from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), along with some metadata. While this metadata includes valuable information, such as the application number and the articles addressed in a case, it often lacks detailed substantive insights, such as the specific issues a case covers. This underscores the need for detailed analysis to extract such information. However, given the size of the database - containing over 40,000 cases - an automated solution is essential. In this study, we focus on the right to adequate housing and aim to build models to detect cases related to housing and eviction issues. Our experiments show that the resulting models not only provide performance comparable to more sophisticated approaches but are also interpretable, offering explanations for their decisions by highlighting the most influential words. The application of these models led to the identification of new cases that were initially overlooked during data collection. This suggests that NLP approaches can be effectively applied to categorise case law based on the specific issues they address.

The Danger of Reverse-Engineering of Automated Judicial Decision-Making Systems

In this paper we discuss the implications of using machine learning for judicial decision-making in situations where human rights may be infringed. We argue that the use of such tools in these situations should be limited due to inherent status quo bias and dangers of reverse-engineering. We discuss that these issues already exist in the judicial systems without using machine learning tools, but how introducing them might exacerbate them.