Optimizing Sensor Network Design for Multiple Coverage

Sensor placement optimization methods have been studied extensively. They can be applied to a wide range of applications, including surveillance of known environments, optimal locations for 5G towers, and placement of missile defense systems. However, few works explore the robustness and efficiency of the resulting sensor network concerning sensor failure or adversarial attacks. This paper addresses this issue by optimizing for the least number of sensors to achieve multiple coverage of non-simply connected domains by a prescribed number of sensors. We introduce a new objective function for the greedy (next-best-view) algorithm to design efficient and robust sensor networks and derive theoretical bounds on the network's optimality. We further introduce a Deep Learning model to accelerate the algorithm for near real-time computations. The Deep Learning model requires the generation of training examples. Correspondingly, we show that understanding the geometric properties of the training data set provides important insights into the performance and training process of deep learning techniques. Finally, we demonstrate that a simple parallel version of the greedy approach using a simpler objective can be highly competitive.

Efficient and robust Sensor Placement in Complex Environments

We address the problem of efficient and unobstructed surveillance or communication in complex environments. On one hand, one wishes to use a minimal number of sensors to cover the environment. On the other hand, it is often important to consider solutions that are robust against sensor failure or adversarial attacks. This paper addresses these challenges of designing minimal sensor sets that achieve multi-coverage constraints -- every point in the environment is covered by a prescribed number of sensors. We propose a greedy algorithm to achieve the objective. Further, we explore deep learning techniques to accelerate the evaluation of the objective function formulated in the greedy algorithm. The training of the neural network reveals that the geometric properties of the data significantly impact the network's performance, particularly at the end stage. By taking into account these properties, we discuss the differences in using greedy and $\epsilon$-greedy algorithms to generate data and their impact on the robustness of the network.