A study of the Multicriteria decision analysis based on the time-series features and a TOPSIS method proposal for a tensorial approach

A number of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods have been developed to rank alternatives based on several decision criteria. Usually, MCDA methods deal with the criteria value at the time the decision is made without considering their evolution over time. However, it may be relevant to consider the criteria' time series since providing essential information for decision-making (e.g., an improvement of the criteria). To deal with this issue, we propose a new approach to rank the alternatives based on the criteria time-series features (tendency, variance, etc.). In this novel approach, the data is structured in three dimensions, which require a more complex data structure, as the \textit{tensors}, instead of the classical matrix representation used in MCDA. Consequently, we propose an extension for the TOPSIS method to handle a tensor rather than a matrix. Computational results reveal that it is possible to rank the alternatives from a new perspective by considering meaningful decision-making information.

A multi-objective-based approach for Fair Principal Component Analysis

In dimension reduction problems, the adopted technique may produce disparities between the representation errors of two or more different groups. For instance, in the projected space, a specific class can be better represented in comparison with the other ones. Depending on the situation, this unfair result may introduce ethical concerns. In this context, this paper investigates how a fairness measure can be considered when performing dimension reduction through principal component analysis. Since both reconstruction error and fairness measure must be taken into account, we propose a multi-objective-based approach to tackle the Fair Principal Component Analysis problem. The experiments attest that a fairer result can be achieved with a very small loss in the reconstruction error.