Using neuroevolution for designing soft medical devices

Soft robots can exhibit better performance in specific tasks compared to conventional robots, particularly in healthcare-related tasks. However, the field of soft robotics is still young, and designing them often involves mimicking natural organisms or relying heavily on human experts' creativity. A formal automated design process is required. We propose the use of neuroevolution-based algorithms to automatically design initial sketches of soft actuators that can enable the movement of future medical devices, such as drug-delivering catheters. The actuator morphologies discovered by algorithms like Age-Fitness Pareto Optimization, NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies (NEAT), and Hypercube-based NEAT (HyperNEAT) were compared based on the maximum displacement reached and their robustness against various control methods. Analyzing the results granted the insight that neuroevolution-based algorithms produce better-performing and more robust actuators under different control methods. Moreover, the best-performing morphologies were discovered by the NEAT algorithm. As a future work aspect, we propose using the morphologies discovered here as test beds to optimize specialized controllers, enabling more effective functionality towards the desired deflections of the suggested soft catheters.

NeuroEvolution algorithms applied in the designing process of biohybrid actuators

Soft robots diverge from traditional rigid robotics, offering unique advantages in adaptability, safety, and human-robot interaction. In some cases, soft robots can be powered by biohybrid actuators and the design process of these systems is far from straightforward. We analyse here two algorithms that may assist the design of these systems, namely, NEAT (NeuroEvolution of Augmented Topologies) and HyperNEAT (Hypercube-based NeuroEvolution of Augmented Topologies). These algorithms exploit the evolution of the structure of actuators encoded through neural networks. To evaluate these algorithms, we compare them with a similar approach using the Age Fitness Pareto Optimization (AFPO) algorithm, with a focus on assessing the maximum displacement achieved by the discovered biohybrid morphologies. Additionally, we investigate the effects of optimization against both the volume of these morphologies and the distance they can cover. To further accelerate the computational process, the proposed methodology is implemented in a client-server setting; so, the most demanding calculations can be executed on specialized and efficient hardware. The results indicate that the HyperNEAT-based approach excels in identifying morphologies with minimal volumes that still achieve satisfactory displacement targets.

Using coevolution and substitution of the fittest for health and well-being recommender systems

This research explores substitution of the fittest (SF), a technique designed to counteract the problem of disengagement in two-population competitive coevolutionary genetic algorithms. SF is domain-independent and requires no calibration. We first perform a controlled comparative evaluation of SF's ability to maintain engagement and discover optimal solutions in a minimal toy domain. Experimental results demonstrate that SF is able to maintain engagement better than other techniques in the literature. We then address the more complex real-world problem of evolving recommendations for health and well-being. We introduce a coevolutionary extension of EvoRecSys, a previously published evolutionary recommender system. We demonstrate that SF is able to maintain engagement better than other techniques in the literature, and the resultant recommendations using SF are higher quality and more diverse than those produced by EvoRecSys.

Substitution of the Fittest: A Novel Approach for Mitigating Disengagement in Coevolutionary Genetic Algorithms

We propose substitution of the fittest (SF), a novel technique designed to counteract the problem of disengagement in two-population competitive coevolutionary genetic algorithms. The approach presented is domain-independent and requires no calibration. In a minimal domain, we perform a controlled evaluation of the ability to maintain engagement and the capacity to discover optimal solutions. Results demonstrate that the solution discovery performance of SF is comparable with other techniques in the literature, while SF also offers benefits including a greater ability to maintain engagement and a much simpler mechanism.