Reliability and repeatability of ISO 3382-3 metrics based on repeated acoustic measurements in open-plan offices

This paper investigates variability in the key ISO 3382-3:2012 metrics, based primarily on the repeatability and reliability of these metrics, using repeated measurements in open-plan offices. Two types of repeated measurements were performed in offices, Type1 (n=36), where the same path over workstations was measured from opposite ends, and Type2 (n=7), where two different measurement paths were measured. Overall, most of the Type1 results seem reasonable considering repeats were conducted in complicated room acoustic environments, while Type2 repeats would benefit from larger sample sizes in future studies. Some recommendations are outlined for the ISO 3382-3 methodology vis-a-vis Type1 and Type2 repeats, including future research directions that go beyond increased sample sizes. (This is an abridged version of the abstract. Please see the paper for the full abstract)

Autophonic Loudness of Singers in Simulated Room Acoustic Environments

This paper aims to study the effect of room acoustics and phonemes on the perception of loudness of one's own voice (autophonic loudness) for a group of trained singers. For a set of five phonemes, 20 singers vocalized over several autophonic loudness ratios, while maintaining pitch constancy over extreme voice levels, within five simulated rooms. There were statistically significant differences in the slope of the autophonic loudness function (logarithm of autophonic loudness as a function of voice sound pressure level) for the five phonemes, with slopes ranging from 1.3 (/a:/) to 2.0 (/z:/). There was no significant variation in the autophonic loudness function slopes with variations in room acoustics. The autophonic room response, which represents a systematic decrease in voice levels with increasing levels of room reflections, was also studied, with some evidence found in support. Overall, the average slope of the autophonic room response for the three corner vowels (/a:/, /i:/, and /u:/) was -1.4 for medium autophonic loudness. The findings relating to the slope of the autophonic loudness function are in agreement with the findings of previous studies where the sensorimotor mechanisms in regulating voice were shown to be more important in the perception of autophonic loudness than hearing of room acoustics. However, the role of room acoustics, in terms of the autophonic room response, is shown to be more complicated, requiring further inquiry. Overall, it is shown that autophonic loudness grows at more than twice the rate of loudness growth for sounds created outside the human body.

Two simultaneous talkers distract more than one in simulated multi-talker environments, regardless of overall sound levels typical of open-plan offices

The irrelevant speech effect (ISE) characterizes detriment to cognitive task performance in the presence of irrelevant speech. This paper examines whether the ISE varies due to the number of simultaneously active nearby talkers (for up to two talkers), or the overall sound level, within the context of a simulated open-plan office. Two experiments were conducted within a climate-controlled chamber that was set-up as a medium-sized open-plan office. The cognitive tasks performed by the participants included the digit recall task, and a writing task, within a room acoustic simulation of realistic multi-talker speech from spatially separated talkers. Within Experiment 1 (n=60), an increase in the number of talkers from none (T0) to one (T1), and from one to two (T2) simultaneous talkers resulted in statistically significant decline in the digit recall task performances, with effect sizes of 24% (i.e., T1 vs. T0), and 12% (i.e., T2 vs. T1), respectively. The pauses between words during the writing task were similar for T0 and T1, but showed a statistically significant increase within T2 vs. T1, with an effect size of 12%. The findings of Experiment 1 are inconsistent with the maximally distracting status attributed to T1 in some studies, but is consistent with findings in other studies. Within Experiment 2 (n = 62), the cognitive performance in T2 remained largely invariant between 45 and 57 dB (A-weighted sound pressure levels), which represents a typical range of levels within open-plan offices. In general, these findings have relevance for characterizing auditory distraction within complex multi-talker environments; both in laboratory studies and actual open-plan offices. (Abridged version; please see the paper for the full abstract)

Sound in occupied open-plan offices: Objective metrics with a review of historical perspectives

Open-plan offices (OPOs) have been around for more than half a century now, chronicling the vicissitudes of workplace topography amongst other factors. This paper addresses one such factor - the sound environment in occupied OPOs in relation to several objective workplace parameters, using measurements in contemporary OPOs and comparisons with studies over the last 50 years. Omnidirectional and binaural sound measurements were conducted in 43 offices during typical working hours. The results describe variation in several acoustic and psychoacoustic metrics, and present statistical models that predict these metrics as a function of the number of workstations in offices. LA,eq of 53.6 dB is typical for occupied OPOs, with spectral slope of approximately -4 dB/octave. LA,eq values do not vary much over the workplace parameters studied (e.g., floor plate area, work activity, etc), except for -2.7 dB and -4.1 dB differences between offices with/without carpeting, and offices with ceiling absorption but with/without carpeting, respectively; most likely from reduced floor impact noise leading to speech level reduction. Sound fluctuation, as characterised by the metric Noise Climate (NCl: LA10 - LA90) and the psychoacoustic Fluctuation Strength (FS), decreases significantly with increasing number of workstations in OPOs. This suggests lesser auditory distraction in larger offices, which needs further investigation. In terms of historical trends, OPOs have become quieter over the years, especially background noise quantified as LA90, although there are several subtleties. Overall, current findings can inform several OPO design perspectives including policy documents, provide values for laboratory simulations of OPO acoustic environments, help interpret subjective impressions of OPO occupants, etc.