ResNets Are Deeper Than You Think

Residual connections remain ubiquitous in modern neural network architectures nearly a decade after their introduction. Their widespread adoption is often credited to their dramatically improved trainability: residual networks train faster, more stably, and achieve higher accuracy than their feedforward counterparts. While numerous techniques, ranging from improved initialization to advanced learning rate schedules, have been proposed to close the performance gap between residual and feedforward networks, this gap has persisted. In this work, we propose an alternative explanation: residual networks do not merely reparameterize feedforward networks, but instead inhabit a different function space. We design a controlled post-training comparison to isolate generalization performance from trainability; we find that variable-depth architectures, similar to ResNets, consistently outperform fixed-depth networks, even when optimization is unlikely to make a difference. These results suggest that residual connections confer performance advantages beyond optimization, pointing instead to a deeper inductive bias aligned with the structure of natural data.

Spreads in Effective Learning Rates: The Perils of Batch Normalization During Early Training

Excursions in gradient magnitude pose a persistent challenge when training deep networks. In this paper, we study the early training phases of deep normalized ReLU networks, accounting for the induced scale invariance by examining effective learning rates (LRs). Starting with the well-known fact that batch normalization (BN) leads to exponentially exploding gradients at initialization, we develop an ODE-based model to describe early training dynamics. Our model predicts that in the gradient flow, effective LRs will eventually equalize, aligning with empirical findings on warm-up training. Using large LRs is analogous to applying an explicit solver to a stiff non-linear ODE, causing overshooting and vanishing gradients in lower layers after the first step. Achieving overall balance demands careful tuning of LRs, depth, and (optionally) momentum. Our model predicts the formation of spreads in effective LRs, consistent with empirical measurements. Moreover, we observe that large spreads in effective LRs result in training issues concerning accuracy, indicating the importance of controlling these dynamics. To further support a causal relationship, we implement a simple scheduling scheme prescribing uniform effective LRs across layers and confirm accuracy benefits.

Average Path Length: Sparsification of Nonlinearties Creates Surprisingly Shallow Networks

We perform an empirical study of the behaviour of deep networks when pushing its activation functions to become fully linear in some of its feature channels through a sparsity prior on the overall number of nonlinear units in the network. To measure the depth of the resulting partially linearized network, we compute the average number of active nonlinearities encountered along a path in the network graph. In experiments on CNNs with sparsified PReLUs on typical image classification tasks, we make several observations: Under sparsity pressure, the remaining nonlinear units organize into distinct structures, forming core-networks of near constant effective depth and width, which in turn depend on task difficulty. We consistently observe a slow decay of performance with depth until the onset of a rapid collapse in accuracy, allowing for surprisingly shallow networks at moderate losses in accuracy that outperform base-line networks of similar depth, even after increasing width to a comparable number of parameters. In terms of training, we observe a nonlinear advantage: Reducing nonlinearity after training leads to a better performance than before, in line with previous findings in linearized training, but with a gap depending on task difficulty that vanishes for easy problems.