Causal Reasoning in Software Quality Assurance: A Systematic Review

Context: Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is a fundamental part of software engineering to ensure stakeholders that software products work as expected after release in operation. Machine Learning (ML) has proven to be able to boost SQA activities and contribute to the development of quality software systems. In this context, Causal Reasoning is gaining increasing interest as a methodology to solve some of the current ML limitations. It aims to go beyond a purely data-driven approach by exploiting the use of causality for more effective SQA strategies. Objective: Provide a broad and detailed overview of the use of causal reasoning for SQA activities, in order to support researchers to access this research field, identifying room for application, main challenges and research opportunities. Methods: A systematic literature review of causal reasoning in the SQA research area. Scientific papers have been searched, classified, and analyzed according to established guidelines for software engineering secondary studies. Results: Results highlight the primary areas within SQA where causal reasoning has been applied, the predominant methodologies used, and the level of maturity of the proposed solutions. Fault localization is the activity where causal reasoning is more exploited, especially in the web services/microservices domain, but other tasks like testing are rapidly gaining popularity. Both causal inference and causal discovery are exploited, with the Pearl's graphical formulation of causality being preferred, likely due to its intuitiveness. Tools to favour their application are appearing at a fast pace - most of them after 2021. Conclusions: The findings show that causal reasoning is a valuable means for SQA tasks with respect to multiple quality attributes, especially during V&V, evolution and maintenance to ensure reliability, while it is not yet fully exploited for phases like ...

DeepSample: DNN sampling-based testing for operational accuracy assessment

Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are core components for classification and regression tasks of many software systems. Companies incur in high costs for testing DNN with datasets representative of the inputs expected in operation, as these need to be manually labelled. The challenge is to select a representative set of test inputs as small as possible to reduce the labelling cost, while sufficing to yield unbiased high-confidence estimates of the expected DNN accuracy. At the same time, testers are interested in exposing as many DNN mispredictions as possible to improve the DNN, ending up in the need for techniques pursuing a threefold aim: small dataset size, trustworthy estimates, mispredictions exposure. This study presents DeepSample, a family of DNN testing techniques for cost-effective accuracy assessment based on probabilistic sampling. We investigate whether, to what extent, and under which conditions probabilistic sampling can help to tackle the outlined challenge. We implement five new sampling-based testing techniques, and perform a comprehensive comparison of such techniques and of three further state-of-the-art techniques for both DNN classification and regression tasks. Results serve as guidance for best use of sampling-based testing for faithful and high-confidence estimates of DNN accuracy in operation at low cost.

Iterative Assessment and Improvement of DNN Operational Accuracy

Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are nowadays largely adopted in many application domains thanks to their human-like, or even superhuman, performance in specific tasks. However, due to unpredictable/unconsidered operating conditions, unexpected failures show up on field, making the performance of a DNN in operation very different from the one estimated prior to release. In the life cycle of DNN systems, the assessment of accuracy is typically addressed in two ways: offline, via sampling of operational inputs, or online, via pseudo-oracles. The former is considered more expensive due to the need for manual labeling of the sampled inputs. The latter is automatic but less accurate. We believe that emerging iterative industrial-strength life cycle models for Machine Learning systems, like MLOps, offer the possibility to leverage inputs observed in operation not only to provide faithful estimates of a DNN accuracy, but also to improve it through remodeling/retraining actions. We propose DAIC (DNN Assessment and Improvement Cycle), an approach which combines ''low-cost'' online pseudo-oracles and ''high-cost'' offline sampling techniques to estimate and improve the operational accuracy of a DNN in the iterations of its life cycle. Preliminary results show the benefits of combining the two approaches and integrating them in the DNN life cycle.