Dropout Robustness and Cognitive Profiling of Transformer Models via Stochastic Inference

Transformer-based language models are widely deployed for reasoning, yet their behavior under inference-time stochasticity remains underexplored. While dropout is common during training, its inference-time effects via Monte Carlo sampling lack systematic evaluation across architectures, limiting understanding of model reliability in uncertainty-aware applications. This work analyzes dropout-induced variability across 19 transformer models using MC Dropout with 100 stochastic forward passes per sample. Dropout robustness is defined as maintaining high accuracy and stable predictions under stochastic inference, measured by standard deviation of per-run accuracies. A cognitive decomposition framework disentangles performance into memory and reasoning components. Experiments span five dropout configurations yielding 95 unique evaluations on 1,000 samples. Results reveal substantial architectural variation. Smaller models demonstrate perfect prediction stability while medium-sized models exhibit notable volatility. Mid-sized models achieve the best overall performance; larger models excel at memory tasks. Critically, 53% of models suffer severe accuracy degradation under baseline MC Dropout, with task-specialized models losing up to 24 percentage points, indicating unsuitability for uncertainty quantification in these architectures. Asymmetric effects emerge: high dropout reduces memory accuracy by 27 percentage points while reasoning degrades only 1 point, suggesting memory tasks rely on stable representations that dropout disrupts. 84% of models demonstrate memory-biased performance. This provides the first comprehensive MC Dropout benchmark for transformers, revealing dropout robustness is architecture-dependent and uncorrelated with scale. The cognitive profiling framework offers actionable guidance for model selection in uncertainty-aware applications.

AI Content Self-Detection for Transformer-based Large Language Models

$ $The usage of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, including ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude, for text generation has many exciting applications with the potential for phenomenal productivity gains. One issue is authorship attribution when using AI tools. This is especially important in an academic setting where the inappropriate use of generative AI tools may hinder student learning or stifle research by creating a large amount of automatically generated derivative work. Existing plagiarism detection systems can trace the source of submitted text but are not yet equipped with methods to accurately detect AI-generated text. This paper introduces the idea of direct origin detection and evaluates whether generative AI systems can recognize their output and distinguish it from human-written texts. We argue why current transformer-based models may be able to self-detect their own generated text and perform a small empirical study using zero-shot learning to investigate if that is the case. Results reveal varying capabilities of AI systems to identify their generated text. Google's Bard model exhibits the largest capability of self-detection with an accuracy of 94\%, followed by OpenAI's ChatGPT with 83\%. On the other hand, Anthropic's Claude model seems to be not able to self-detect.