Abstract:Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are effective measures to contain a pandemic. Yet, such control measures commonly have a negative effect on the economy. Here, we propose a macro-level approach to support resolving this Health-Economy Dilemma (HED). First, an extension to the well-known SEIR model is suggested which includes an economy model. Second, a bi-objective optimization problem is defined to study optimal control policies in view of the HED problem. Next, several multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are applied to perform a study on the health-economy performance trade-offs that are inherent to the obtained optimal policies. Finally, the results from the applied algorithms are compared to select a preferred algorithm for future studies. As expected, for the proposed models and strategies, a clear conflict between the health and economy performances is found. Furthermore, the results suggest that the guided usage of NPIs is preferable as compared to refraining from employing such strategies at all. This study contributes to pandemic modeling and simulation by providing a novel concept that elaborates on integrating economic aspects while exploring the optimal moment to enable NPIs.
Abstract:Evolving Counter-Propagation Neuro-Controllers (CPNCs), rather than the traditional Feed-Forward Neuro-Controllers (FFNCs), has recently been suggested and tested using simulated robot navigation. It has been demon-strated that both convergence rate and final performance obtained by evolving CPNCs are superior to those obtained by evolving FFNCs. In this paper the maze generalization features of both types of evolved navigation controllers are examined. For this purpose the controllers are tested in an environment that drastically differs from the one used for their training. Moreover, a comparison is carried out of results obtained by single-objective and multi-objective evolution approaches. Using a simulated case-study, the maze generalization capability of the evolved CPNCs is highlighted in both the single and multi-objective cases. In contrast, the evolved FFNCs are found to lack such capabilities in both approaches.
Abstract:The set-based concept approach has been suggested as a means to simultaneously explore different design concepts, which are meaningful sub-sets of the entire set of solutions. Previous efforts concerning the suggested approach focused on either revealing the global front (s-Pareto front), of all the concepts, or on finding the concepts' fronts, within a relaxation zone. In contrast, here the aim is to reveal which of the concepts have at least one solution with a performance vector within a pre-defined window-of-interest (WOI). This paper provides the rational for this new concept-based exploration problem, and suggests a WOI-based rather than Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. The proposed algorithm, which simultaneously explores different concepts, is tested using a recently suggested concept-based benchmarking approach. The numerical study of this paper shows that the algorithm can cope with various numerical difficulties in a simultaneous way, which outperforms a sequential exploration approach.