Supporting Assessment of Novelty of Design Problems Using Concept of Problem SAPPhIRE

This paper proposes a framework for assessing the novelty of design problems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality. The novelty of a problem is measured as its minimum distance from the problems in a reference problem database. The distance is calculated by comparing the current problem and each reference past problem at the various levels of abstraction in the SAPPhIRE ontology. The basis for comparison is textual similarity. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, The current set of problems associated with an artifact, as collected from its stakeholders, were compared with the past set of problems, as collected from patents and other web sources, to assess the novelty of the current set. This approach is aimed at providing a better understanding of the degree of novelty of any given set of current problems by comparing them to similar problems available from historical records. Since manual assessment, the current mode of such assessments as reported in the literature, is a tedious process, to reduce time complexity and to afford better applicability for larger sets of problem statements, an automated assessment is proposed and used in this paper.

Assessing the Variety of a Concept Space Using an Unbiased Estimate of Rao's Quadratic Index

Past research relates design creativity to 'divergent thinking,' i.e., how well the concept space is explored during the early phase of design. Researchers have argued that generating several concepts would increase the chances of producing better design solutions. 'Variety' is one of the parameters by which one can quantify the breadth of a concept space explored by the designers. It is useful to assess variety at the conceptual design stage because, at this stage, designers have the freedom to explore different solution principles so as to satisfy a design problem with substantially novel concepts. This article elaborates on and critically examines the existing variety metrics from the engineering design literature, discussing their limitations. A new distance-based variety metric is proposed, along with a prescriptive framework to support the assessment process. This framework uses the SAPPhIRE model of causality as a knowledge representation scheme to measure the real-valued distance between two design concepts. The proposed framework is implemented in a software tool called 'VariAnT.' Furthermore, the tool's application is demonstrated through an illustrative example.

A Study on Effect of Reference Knowledge Choice in Generating Technical Content Relevant to SAPPhIRE Model Using Large Language Model

Representation of systems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality can be an inspirational stimulus in design. However, creating a SAPPhIRE model of a technical or a natural system requires sourcing technical knowledge from multiple technical documents regarding how the system works. This research investigates how to generate technical content accurately relevant to the SAPPhIRE model of causality using a Large Language Model, also called LLM. This paper, which is the first part of the two-part research, presents a method for hallucination suppression using Retrieval Augmented Generating with LLM to generate technical content supported by the scientific information relevant to a SAPPhIRE con-struct. The result from this research shows that the selection of reference knowledge used in providing context to the LLM for generating the technical content is very important. The outcome of this research is used to build a software support tool to generate the SAPPhIRE model of a given technical system.

Development and Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Tool for Creating SAPPhIRE Models of Artificial Systems

Representing systems using the SAPPhIRE causality model is found useful in supporting design-by-analogy. However, creating a SAPPhIRE model of artificial or biological systems is an effort-intensive process that requires human experts to source technical knowledge from multiple technical documents regarding how the system works. This research investigates how to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) in creating structured descriptions of systems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality. This paper, the second part of the two-part research, presents a new Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tool for generating information related to SAPPhIRE constructs of artificial systems and reports the results from a preliminary evaluation of the tool's success - focusing on the factual accuracy and reliability of outcomes.