GiesKaNe: Bridging Past and Present in Grammatical Theory and Practical Application

This article explores the requirements for corpus compilation within the GiesKaNe project (University of Giessen and Kassel, Syntactic Basic Structures of New High German). The project is defined by three central characteristics: it is a reference corpus, a historical corpus, and a syntactically deeply annotated treebank. As a historical corpus, GiesKaNe aims to establish connections with both historical and contemporary corpora, ensuring its relevance across temporal and linguistic contexts. The compilation process strikes the balance between innovation and adherence to standards, addressing both internal project goals and the broader interests of the research community. The methodological complexity of such a project is managed through a complementary interplay of human expertise and machine-assisted processes. The article discusses foundational topics such as tokenization, normalization, sentence definition, tagging, parsing, and inter-annotator agreement, alongside advanced considerations. These include comparisons between grammatical models, annotation schemas, and established de facto annotation standards as well as the integration of human and machine collaboration. Notably, a novel method for machine-assisted classification of texts along the continuum of conceptual orality and literacy is proposed, offering new perspectives on text selection. Furthermore, the article introduces an approach to deriving de facto standard annotations from existing ones, mediating between standardization and innovation. In the course of describing the workflow the article demonstrates that even ambitious projects like GiesKaNe can be effectively implemented using existing research infrastructure, requiring no specialized annotation tools. Instead, it is shown that the workflow can be based on the strategic use of a simple spreadsheet and integrates the capabilities of the existing infrastructure.

A scale of conceptual orality and literacy: Automatic text categorization in the tradition of "Nähe und Distanz"

Koch and Oesterreicher's model of "N\"ahe und Distanz" (N\"ahe = immediacy, conceptual orality; Distanz = distance, conceptual literacy) is constantly used in German linguistics. However, there is no statistical foundation for use in corpus linguistic analyzes, while it is increasingly moving into empirical corpus linguistics. Theoretically, it is stipulated, among other things, that written texts can be rated on a scale of conceptual orality and literacy by linguistic features. This article establishes such a scale based on PCA and combines it with automatic analysis. Two corpora of New High German serve as examples. When evaluating established features, a central finding is that features of conceptual orality and literacy must be distinguished in order to rank texts in a differentiated manner. The scale is also discussed with a view to its use in corpus compilation and as a guide for analyzes in larger corpora. With a theory-driven starting point and as a "tailored" dimension, the approach compared to Biber's Dimension 1 is particularly suitable for these supporting, controlling tasks.