Is Shafer General Bayes?

This paper examines the relationship between Shafer's belief functions and convex sets of probability distributions. Kyburg's (1986) result showed that belief function models form a subset of the class of closed convex probability distributions. This paper emphasizes the importance of Kyburg's result by looking at simple examples involving Bernoulli trials. Furthermore, it is shown that many convex sets of probability distributions generate the same belief function in the sense that they support the same lower and upper values. This has implications for a decision theoretic extension. Dempster's rule of combination is also compared with Bayes' rule of conditioning.

Hierarchical Evidence and Belief Functions

Dempster/Shafer (D/S) theory has been advocated as a way of representing incompleteness of evidence in a system's knowledge base. Methods now exist for propagating beliefs through chains of inference. This paper discusses how rules with attached beliefs, a common representation for knowledge in automated reasoning systems, can be transformed into the joint belief functions required by propagation algorithms. A rule is taken as defining a conditional belief function on the consequent given the antecedents. It is demonstrated by example that different joint belief functions may be consistent with a given set of rules. Moreover, different representations of the same rules may yield different beliefs on the consequent hypotheses.