Abstract:Biometric data is pervasively captured and analyzed. Using modern machine learning approaches, identity and attribute inferences attacks have proven high accuracy. Anonymizations aim to mitigate such disclosures by modifying data in a way that prevents identification. However, the effectiveness of some anonymizations is unclear. Therefore, improvements of the corresponding evaluation methodology have been proposed recently. In this paper, we introduce SEBA, a framework for strong evaluation of biometric anonymizations. It combines and implements the state-of-the-art methodology in an easy-to-use and easy-to-expand software framework. This allows anonymization designers to easily test their techniques using a strong evaluation methodology. As part of this discourse, we introduce and discuss new metrics that allow for a more straightforward evaluation of the privacy-utility trade-off that is inherent to anonymization attempts. Finally, we report on a prototypical experiment to demonstrate SEBA's applicability.
Abstract:Biometric data is a rich source of information that can be used to identify individuals and infer private information about them. To mitigate this privacy risk, anonymization techniques employ transformations on clear data to obfuscate sensitive information, all while retaining some utility of the data. Albeit published with impressive claims, they sometimes are not evaluated with convincing methodology. We hence are interested to which extent recently suggested anonymization techniques for obfuscating facial images are effective. More specifically, we test how easily they can be automatically reverted, to estimate the privacy they can provide. Our approach is agnostic to the anonymization technique as we learn a machine learning model on the clear and corresponding anonymized data. We find that 10 out of 14 tested face anonymization techniques are at least partially reversible, and six of them are at least highly reversible.