Abstract:The 7.3 GHz (350 MHz bandwidth) Earth Observation Satellite (EOS) band, while not protected, is used for Passive Sea Surface Temperature (P-SST) measurements that provide important data for weather forecasts, coastal disaster prevention, climate modeling, and oceanographic research. The full 7 GHz band (7.125 to 8.4 GHz), which encompasses these EOS frequencies, is the largest contiguous block of potentially available mid-band spectrum and will play a significant role in meeting the anticipated demand for wireless services. A Real Time Geofenced Spectrum Sharing (RGSS) system is shown to be a practical and near term solution to spectrum sharing between P-SST measurements and 5G or 6G networks in the 7GHz band. RGSS enables IMT networks and EOS radiometers to share 350MHz of overlapping spectrum centered at 7.3 GHz. It prevents interference to P-SST measurements while simultaneously allowing IMT systems un-constrained access to the shared spectrum greater than 99.9% of the time. Subscriber impact during the less than 0.1 percent paused access time can be prevented by using 3GPP defined capabilities and O-RAN APIs to move subscribers to other frequencies. Paused access time data from a proof-of-concept RGSS system is available to academic, government, and industry researchers through a web or programmatic interface.
Abstract:A simple 'RF-flashlight' (or ground to satellite) interference testbed is proposed to experimentally verify real-time geofencing (RTG) for protecting passive Earth Exploration Satellite Services (EESS) radiometer measurements from 5G or 6G mm-wave transmissions, and ground to satellite propagation models used in the interference modeling of this spectrum coexistence scenario. RTG is a stronger EESS protection mechanism than the current methodology recommended by the ITU based on a worst-case interference threshold while simultaneously enabling dynamic spectrum sharing and coexistence with 5G or 6G wireless networks. Similarly, verifying more sophisticated RF propagation models that include ground topology, buildings, and non-line-of-sight paths will provide better estimates of interference than the current ITU line-of-sight model and, thus, a more reliable basis for establishing a consensus among the spectrum stakeholders.